- Open Access
A UHF/UWB hybrid silicon RFID tag with on–chip antennas
© Gentner et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 21 December 2012
- Accepted: 29 July 2013
- Published: 16 August 2013
In this contribution, we describe and analyse a miniature wireless radio frequency identification (RFID) chip with on-chip antennas (OCA) and ultra wideband (UWB) signalling by real-world measurements. With the on-chip antenna approach, no external antennas are required, and the size of the overall tag is identical to the size of the chip alone (3.5 mm×1 mm). The chip is powered through inductive coupling and controlled by an RFID signal at 866 MHz in the downlink, while the uplink transmits a quaternary pulse-position-modulated (4-PPM) UWB signal at 5.64 GHz with pulses having a duration in the order of nanoseconds. In this contribution, the hybrid or asymmetric communication scheme between prototype chip and reader, the embedded OCA, and the measurement setup are described. The prototype achieves 4-PPM bit rate of 126 Mbit/s based on a pulse-train transmission with a duration of 10 μs. The small size, high data rate, and fine time resolution of the UWB impulse radio offer new features and sensing capabilities for future RFID-like applications.
- Loop Antenna
- Impulse Radio
- Pulse Burst
- Pulse Distance
- Reader Antenna
Tiny systems on chip (SoC) with on-chip antennas (OCAs) are useful if a transmission of data is necessary over a short distance. Especially for radio frequency identification (RFID) systems, the limited communication range increases security and protects privacy.
Small tags combined with sensing capabilities, such as temperature or shock sensors, allow the tracking of individual items for example frozen goods in a cold chain. Due to their small size, the systems on chip can be placed on or in objects while reducing the cost by avoiding bulky antennas.
In this contribution, a fully integrated system on chip is presented, which features on-chip antennas for a hybrid or in other words asymmetric communication scheme. It gives insight into our past achievements and current studies in the field of short range connectivity devices for RFID applications or for wireless sensors. At first, the scheme is explained in detail in section “Asymmetric communication scheme” with a survey of impulse transmitters and related achievements in research. Then our manufactured ultra-high frequency/ultra-wideband (UHF/UWB) hybrid system on chip is introduced, with all its components and a focus on the on-chip antennas used, a dual antenna concept with an electric and a magnetic antenna.
After the description of the device under test, the development of the measurement setup is explained in detail, and also, results are presented in the time and the frequency domains. The decoding of the received wideband data signal from the hybrid UHF/UWB tag is shown. Before the conclusion, the transmission loss between the impulse-transmitting OCA and the according uplink reader antenna is calculated from measurements.
The most famous example of an asymmetric communication scheme is used everyday all over the world through browsing of the web. In the downlink from the provider to the user, a much higher amount of data is needed by pictures, movies, or text. In the uplink, mostly control or request data are sent from a personal computer to the provider. This idea is also used in long-term evolution (LTE), where the downlink peak rates are higher as those in the uplink.
In the case of RFID or sensor applications, the high data rate is shifted to the uplink. Since the tags or sensors are very small and the available power has to be used as efficiently as possible, it is advantageous to have a fast transmission in the uplink. The downlink, from a reader station to a sensor or tag, provides the energy, control commands, and clock for synchronisation in a UHF band, with the data rate being usually lower. A concept of an asymmetric communication scheme for RFID scenarios was introduced by Zheng et al. in  and has been manufactured and characterised in the works of Baghaei-Nejad and Radiom et al. in  and .
In the papers mentioned above, impulse radio UWB is considered as the appropriate scheme for the uplink, being able to provide a fast data rate and also being more power efficient. This has been shown by Calhoun et. al in , who summarise the necessary energy per pulse for UWB transmitters of recent research. The authors found that the energy per pulse is lower than 10nJ/bit and constant over a data rate from 1 Mbit/s to 10 Gbit/s, and compares it with the energy per bit for a bluetooth transmitter being typically 25 nJ/bit.
In our opinion, transmitting pulses in the baseband is not a good choice and should not be considered for the application in mind. The reasons are the following:
The powering UHF field interferes with the spectrum of pulses transmitted in the baseband, which leads to an increased reader complexity.
Reading multiple tags at the same time leads to collisions. Using modulated pulses, the probability of collisions can be reduced by changing the modulation frequency.
A small size reader antenna is important for many applications.
Using on-chip antennas with their small aperture, uplink frequencies in the C- or X-band are preferred.
Non-baseband impulse radio UWB transmitters can be realised in two ways : firstly, baseband pulses can be up-converted with the aid of a local oscillator. Secondly, pulse creation, e.g. with delay lines following pulse shaping filter can be employed. In terms of reduced transmitter power consumption, a pulse-position modulation scheme is very promising because it allows to transmit multiple bits per pulse.
Impulse radio as an additional asset of a tag introduces a multitude of new possibilities and applications for RFID scenarios . In recent UWB research, indoor localisation is studied extensively for example by Meissner et al. in . Concerning localisation, the IEEE standard 802.15.4a provides a good basis for commercial applications. Zheng et al. describe in  a transceiver achieving a ranging accuracy of 3 cm. Readers for localisation will very likely use an array antenna to track the small device. In  and , UWB antenna arrays are introduced and analysed concerning their ability to operate in a wideband spectrum and are consecutively used to operate with the wideband tags.
Two inductively coupled magnetic loop antennas offer a wireless power transfer technique, which is used successfully for medical implants , such as pacemakers and biosensors, or for charging electric vehicles . An RFID tag with an asymmetric communication scheme favourably should store energy from an energy source to be able to transmit pulses. Here, power-scavenging units harvest energy from the narrowband UHF downlink signal. Figures of merits are the efficiency of the rectifier and the value of the capacitor, where the harvested energy is stored. The downlink antenna will usually be an inductive antenna with high Q-factor, whereas a wideband antenna with low Q-factor is required in the uplink.
Functionality of the system on chip
In the early research of on-chip antennas, these antennas were considered as replacements of wired clock distribution  or as wireless interconnects on chip [18, 19]. OCAs are very common in the millimeter-wave region  because this is their native environment.
In the chip presented, a meandered monopole is placed inside a loop antenna, and both are located within the chip area. The antennas are placed on the chip in a way that no electrical circuits are below the antenna. The structure is shown in top of Figure 2. To support the monopole, the remaining part of the silicon is covered with metal and connected to the chips’ VSS, which acts as the ground plane. A single-ended antenna is used to avoid a differential power amplification in the front end. This reduces the overall power consumption.
The silicon substrate thickness is 220 μm, with the conductivity being larger than 50 S/m. In , where exemplary dipoles have been simulated on a CMOS layer stack, it has been shown that the lossy substrate reduces the Q-factor of the antenna and therefore supports a wideband communication scheme, even when the aperture of the antenna is very small.
All antennas are placed in a so-called inductive layer in which metal filling structures between the turns are avoided. The width of the conductor used to form the monopole is 15 μm with a total unwrapped length of 4.85 mm which is approximately λ/10. The distance between each turn is 90 μm. With increasing distance to the excitation port, the width of the meandered monopole increases from 90 to 800 μm in eight steps. For the uplink and the downlink antenna, three metal layers each are connected in parallel by vias to increase the thickness of the conductor. The magnetic loop antenna with four turns and chamfered edges is square with a width of 989 μm. The conductor used for the loop has a width of 15 μm and a spacing of 2.6 μm. With a method of moments (MOM) simulator (Sonnet Software, North Syracuse, NY, USA) the inductance of the loop was calculated to be 50.2 nH, and the impedance of the meandered monopole was determined as ZuplinkMOM = (11.6 - 6.6j) Ω. The accurateness of the simulation result is dependent on the physical size of the antenna and the simulation method itself, especially for small wires such as the conductors for the OCAs . Therefore, and for further investigations, the meandered monopole was simulated with a finite element method (FEM) solver (HFSS - Ansoft, Ansys, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA). The impedance thus obtained is ZuplinkFEM = (23.4 + 3.66j) Ω. The real part of the numerically calculated impedance from the FEM simulation is larger because the metallic antenna parts must be modelled as solid aluminium. This is in contrast to the MOM simulation, where all thin metal layers are accurately modelled as a combination of copper and aluminium. Therefore, the impedance’s real part is lower in the MOM simulation. In comparison to theoretical predictions for electrically small antennas, the real part is very much dominated by the losses due to the conductive silicon substrate underneath.
The far field gain of the monopole is determined to be -41.5 dBi with an efficiency of -43.56 dB at the targeted centre frequency of 5.8 GHz. The gain flatness is 0.9 dB from 5 to 6.2 GHz which is important for pulse transmission.
In the downlink from the reader to the miniature device, a standard UHF RFID EPC protocol is used. The communication frequency is f c = 866 MHz. A power harvester  stores the energy in a buffer capacitor with a capacitance of CBat = 3.9 nF. The HF rectifier of  is replaced by a standard UHF rectifier. For the functionality of this component, it is not important if the tag is placed in the near or far field of a reader antenna. Moreover the used electric or magnetic antenna connected to rectifier is important, so that the tag can be operated either in the near or far field of a reader. The harvester needs a minimum input of Pmin = -15 dBm for operation. The DC current consumption of the tag is 8.5 μA. Simulations show that a power of P = -10 dBm, not needed by the transponder circuitry, is redirected into the charge pump, placed before the buffer capacitor. A schematic of the tag is shown in the bottom of Figure 2.
Once the capacitor is fully charged and the command to transmit the hardwired sequence is triggered by the RFID reader, pulses with a nominal width of either wlow = 0.78 ns or whigh = 1.3 ns are created by the glitch generator and transmitted by the monopole antenna. The uplink frequency is f c = 5.8 GHz. The motivation of this uplink frequency is not triggered by standardisation; furthermore, it is a trade-off between CMOS transit frequency and hence a low power consumption of the active front end. Since a carrier-based pulse radio is considered in the tag, a centre frequency within an available ISM band is feasible. A pulse-position modulation is used, where four sub frames and one guard frame form one symbol frame (4-PPM). The transmitted data sequence consists of 16 symbols, which are repeated until the capacitor reaches a minimum level of charge. In the design, the data rate was calculated to be 117 Mbit/s and the nominal symbol rate is 58 Msym/s. The supply voltage of the UWB front end is 1.5 V, controlled by a low-dropout (LDO) regulator placed before the UWB front end. The available power Pout provided by the single-ended amplifier to the OCA monopole was simulated using Cadence software to be -1.3 dBm. The simulated antenna impedance is connected in Cadence to the front end, and the peak output power of a continuous wave delivered by the front end is determined. In the following measurements, the pulse mode is analysed, hence the available power has to be corrected with the duty cycle of the pulse signal. Therefore, in pulse mode, with a pulse width of wlow = 0.78 ns and a duty cycle of D = 4.5%, the available power fed to the OCA is Pout = -28.2 dBm.
Since the pulse burst transmitted by the silicon is as short as 10 μs, a triggering event is required. Therefore, the initial rising edge of the UHF signal is sampled by a coupler and consequently used as trigger source for the oscilloscope. Following the coupler two lowpass filters in series suppress the spurious harmonics produced by the UHF reader.
The scenario is shown in the subfigure in Figure 3: The downlink excitation coil is printed on a standard FR4 substrate and is matched to the downlink path (centre frequency 866 MHz). This external loop antenna replaces the internal antenna of the UHF reader. In this way, we have more degrees of freedom for characterising the device under test. The UWB silicon chip is fixed with adhesive tape in close vicinity to the excitation coil. We wish to point out, however, that the chip has not a single conductive connection to any part of the measurement equipment.
A reference antenna was positioned in a distance of duplink ≈ 5 mm above the silicon, capturing the silicon’s uplink. This reference antenna is also a loop structure with one turn of copper wire; designed to be resonant at the uplink frequency of 5.8 GHz. The SoC, the UHF excitation coil, and the reference antenna were located inside a brass box to suppress the local WLAN and other interferers.
As shown in schematic view of the measurement setup (Figure 3), a chain of bandpass filters and amplifiers is used before the signal is fed to a digital sampling oscilloscope.
Luplink describes the transmission between the monopole and the reader antenna, including the gain and possible mismatch of both antennas.
Frequency domain measurement
Time domain measurement
Decoding of the UWB uplink 4-PPM signal
The pulse distances are calculated after a threshold comparator. In Figure 7b the pulse distances t Δ of the first 600 symbols (≈10 μs) are shown as a histogram. It shows the occurrence of pulse distances within the captured pulse burst. The amount of pulses having a pulse distance of 15.8 ns is maximum across all pulse distances. It represents consecutive equal symbols in the modulation scheme and being the frame length of the 4-PPM transmission. Only n Δ = 6 distances can be found in the burst. The reason is that one out of seven possible transitions is not present in the hardwired 4-PPM transmitted data. Clear peaks can be observed in this representation. We conclude that no significant timing drift is caused by a decreasing supply voltage to the UWB front end.
All occurring pulse distances t Δ in the data sequence of the burst are plotted versus symbols together with the average t Δ in Figure 7c. In this graph, one can observe that not only the frame rate (t Δ = 15.8 ns) but all other pulse distances are constant until 620 symbols. The pulse distances of all following symbols drift away and a successful decoding is not possible any more.
UWB OCA transmission loss
With an average pulse amplitude of U p = 8 mV and a duty cycle of D = T/τ = 2.6 ns/15.8 ns = 0.16 it is Pmeas = -47.6 dBm. The transmission coefficient between the monopole and the readers’ loop antenna according to this measurement is Luplink = -48.7 dB.
In this contribution, the potential use of on-chip antennas for RFID tags with ultra-wideband signalling is investigated by a prototypical implementation. The SoC is described in detail featuring two on-chip antennas and an asymmetric wireless communication scheme.
The measurement setup is presented which comprises a commercially available UHF RFID dongle and a spectrum analyzer as well as a digital storage oscilloscope. An optimisation is carried out in the uplink path for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal using bandpass filters and amplifiers. Further, interferers in the downlink path (e.g. local WLAN and harmonics of the powering UHF signal) had to be suppressed.
Bursts of nanosecond pulses from the UHF/UWB hybrid silicon RFID tag were captured and analysed with the optimised measurement setup. The time domain and frequency domain measurements were subsequently analysed by post processing. Due to the short transmission time, the low duty cycle and the low transmit power of the signal, we found that it is easier to detect the radiated signal in the time domain. The ability to switch the SoC between different operating modes for data transmission enhances the initial signal detection.
The transmitted ultra-wideband data sequence from the tiny SoC is decoded correctly up to sequence lengths of 1,248 bits. The embedded monopole OCA broaden the pulse width from 0.7 to 2.6 ns. A data transmission with simulated pulse width of 1.3 ns is therefore not successful.
The transmission loss from a CMOS OCA to a reader antenna is estimated to be Luplink = -48.7 dB from transient simulations and measurements.
In comparison to related work in the field , the downlink distance is reduced which is reflected in a much lower power requirement for inductive coupling by 20 dB. We conclude that Impulse Radio is a promising low-power communication scheme for a fast, secure, and power-efficient data transfer for future RFID enhancements.
This work was performed as part of the project ‘ConSens’ (Contactless Sensing) within the funding programme ‘Forschung, Innovation, Technologie - Informationstechnologie’ (FIT-IT) of the ‘Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie’ (BMVIT). The authors wish to thank the members of the COST action IC 1004, “Cooperative Radio Communications for Green Smart Environments,” for countless fruitful discussions.
- Zheng LR, Nejad MB, Zou Z, DS Zou X, Zhang Z, Tenhunen H: Future RFID and wireless sensors for ubiquitous intelligence. In Proc NORCHIP. Tallinn; 16-17 Nov. 2008:142-149.Google Scholar
- Baghaei-Nejad M, Radiom S, Vandenbosch G, Zheng LR, Gielen G: Fully integrated 1.2 pJ/p UWB transmitter with on-chip antenna for wireless identification. In IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. Nanjing; 20-23 Sept. 2010:1-4.Google Scholar
- Radiom S, Baghaei-Nejad M, Aghdam K, Vandenbosch G, Zheng L, Gielen G: Far-field on-chip antennas monolithically integrated in a wireless-powered 5.8-GHz downlink/UWB uplink RFID tag in 0.18 μm standard CMOS. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ 2010,45(9):1746-1758.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calhoun BH, Lach J, Stankovic J, Wentzloff DD, Whitehouse K, Barth AT, Brown JK, Li Q, Oh S, Roberts NE, Zhang Y: Body sensor networks: a holistic approach from silicon to users. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2012, 100: 91-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wentzloff D, Chandrakasan A: Gaussian pulse generators for subbanded ultra-wideband transmitters. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech 2006,54(4):1647-1655.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vauche R, Bergeret E, Gaubert J, Bourdel S, Fourquin O, Dehaese N: A remotely UHF powered UWB transmitter for high precision localization of RFID tag. In IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. Bologna; 14–16 Sept 2011:494-498.Google Scholar
- Meissner P, Arnitz D, Gigl T, Witrisal K: Analysis of an indoor UWB channel for multipath-aided localization. In IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. Bologna; 14–16 Sept. 2011:565-569.Google Scholar
- Zheng Y, Arasu MA, Wong KW, The YJ, Poh AHS, Tran DD, Yeoh WG, Kwong DL: A 0.18μm CMOS 802.15.4a UWB Transceiver for Communication and Localization. In Solid-State Circuits Conference. San Francisco; 3–7 Feb 2008:118-120.Google Scholar
- Gentner PK, Hilton GS, Beach MA, Mecklenbräuker CF: Characterisation of ultra-wideband antenna arrays with spacings following a geometric progression. IET Commun 2012,6(10):1179-1186. 10.1049/iet-com.2010.1054MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gvozdenovic NM, Gentner PK, Mecklenbräuker CF: Antenna array for the reader of an ultra-wideband identification tag with on-chip antenna. In Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference. Loughborough; 14–15 Nov. 2011:1-4.Google Scholar
- Mahfouz M, To G, Kuhn M: No strings attached. IEEE Microwave Mag., 2011,12(7):S34-S48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shinohara N: Power without wires. IEEE Microwave Mag. 2011,12(7):S64-S73.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentner PK, Wiessflecker M, Arthaber H, Scholtz AL, Mecklenbräuker CF: Measured wideband near-field characteristics of an UWB RFID tag with on-chip antenna. In International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. Bologna; 14–16 Sept. 2011:479-483.Google Scholar
- Gentner PK, Hofer G, Scholtz AL, Mecklenbräuker CF: Accurate measurement of power transfer to an RFID tag with on-chip antenna. In Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symp. Moscow; 18–21 Aug. 2012:227-230.Google Scholar
- Gentner PK, Amreich P, Reinisch H, Hofer G: A passive ultra wideband tag for radio frequency identification or wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. Syracuse; 17–20 Sept. 2012:2-5.Google Scholar
- Kulkarni V, Muqsith M: A 750 Mb/s, 12 pJ/b, 6-to-10 GHz CMOS IR-UWB transmitter with embedded on-chip antenna. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 2009,44(2):394-403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim K, Yoon H, O KK: On-chip wireless interconnection with integrated antennas. In Electron Devices Meeting. San Francisco; 10–13 Dec. 2000:485-488.Google Scholar
- Wang Y, Makadia D, Margala M: On-chip integrated antennas - the first challenge for reliable on-chip wireless interconnects. In Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Ottawa; 7–10 May 2006:2322-2325.Google Scholar
- Kikkawa T, Saha PK, Sasaki N, Kimoto K: Gaussian monocycle pulse transmitter using 0.18 μm CMOS technology with on-chip integrated antennas for inter-chip UWB communication. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 2008,43(5):1303-1312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yao T, Tchoketch-Kebir L, Yuryevich O, Voinigescu SP, Gordon M: 65GHz Doppler Sensor with On-Chip Antenna in 0.18μm SiGe BiCMOS. In MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (2006). San Francisco; 11–16 June 2006:1493-1496.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentner PK, Adalan A, Scholtz AL, Mecklenbräuker CF: Impact analysis of silicon and bondwires on an on-chip antenna. In European Conference on Antennas and Propagation. Prague; 26–30 March 2012:3168-3172.Google Scholar
- Estarki MD, Xing Y, Vaughan RG, XU H: The effect of gap size on dipole impedance using the induced EMF method. URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS) Berlin, 16–19 Aug., (IEEE, Piscataway, 2010), pp. 373–376Google Scholar
- Reinisch H, Gruber S, Wiessflecker M, Unterassinger H, Hofer G, Pribyl W, Holweg G: An electro-magnetic energy harvester with 190nW idle mode power consumption for wireless sensor nodes. In European Solid-State Circ. Conference. Seville; 14–16 Sept. 2010:234-237.Google Scholar
- Oppermann I, Hämäläinen M, Iinatti J (Eds): UWB: Theory and Applications. Wiley, West Sussex; 2004.Google Scholar
- Pelissier M, Jantunen J, Gomez B, Arponen J, Masson G, Dia S, Varteva J, Gary M: A 112 Mb/s full duplex remotely-powered impulse-UWB RFID transceiver for wireless NV-memory applications. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2011,46(4):916-927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.