Skip to main content

The Sandbridge SB3011 Platform

Abstract

This paper describes the Sandbridge Sandblaster real-time software-defined radio platform. Specifically, we describe the SB3011 system-on-a-chip multiprocessor. We describe the software development system that enables real-time execution of communications and multimedia applications. We provide results for a number of interesting communications and multimedia systems including UMTS, DVB-H, WiMAX, WiFi, and NTSC video decoding. Each processor core achieves 600 MHz at 0.9 V operation while typically dissipating 75 mW in 90 nm technology. The entire chip typically dissipates less than 500 mW at 0.9 V.

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37]

References

  1. http://www.sdrforum.org/

  2. Blaauw G, Brooks F Jr.: Computer Architecture: Concepts and Evolution. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Case B: Philips hopes to displace DSPs with VLIW. Microprocessor Report 1997,8(16):12-15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kneip J, Weiss M, Drescher W, et al.: Single chip programmable baseband ASSP for 5 GHz wireless LAN applications. IEICE Transactions on Electronics 2002,E85-C(2):359-367.

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Berkel K, Heinle F, Meuwissen PPE, Moerman K, Weiss M: Vector processing as an enabler for software-defined radio in handheld devices. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005,2005(16):2613-2625. 10.1155/ASP.2005.2613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robelly JP, Cichon G, Seidel H, Fettweis G: A HW/SW design methodology for embedded SIMD vector signal processors. International Journal of Embedded Systems 2005,1(11):2-10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glossner J, Raja T, Hokenek E, Moudgill M: A multithreaded processor architecture for SDR. The Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Communication Sciences 2002,19(11):70-84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glossner J, Schulte M, Moudgill M, et al.: Sandblaster low-power multithreaded SDR baseband processor. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Applications Specific Processors (WASP '04), September 2004, Stockholm, Sweden 53-58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee EA: The problem with threads. Computer 2006,39(5):33-42. 10.1109/MC.2006.180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Glossner J, Chirca K, Schulte M, et al.: Sandblaster low power DSP. Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC '04), October 2004, Orlando, Fla, USA 575-581.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moyer B: Low-power design for embedded processors. Proceedings of the IEEE 2001,89(11):1576-1587. 10.1109/5.964439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mudge T: Power: a first-class architectural design constraint. Computer 2001,34(4):52-58. 10.1109/2.917539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wroblewski A, Schumacher O, Schimpfle CV, Nossek JA: Minimizing gate capacitances with transistor sizing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '01), May 2001, Sydney, NSW, Australia 4: 186-189.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borah M, Owens RM, Irwin MJ: Transistor sizing for minimizing power consumption of CMOS circuits under delay constraint. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, April 1995, Dana Point, Calif, USA 167-172.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim S, Kim J, Hwang S-Y: New path balancing algorithm for glitch power reduction. IEE Proceedings: Circuits, Devices and Systems 2001,148(3):151-156. 10.1049/ip-cds:20010343

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Goering R: Platform-based design: a choice, not a panacea. EE Times 2002. http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020911S0061

    Google Scholar 

  17. Silvén O, Jyrkkä K: Observations on power-efficiency trends in mobile communication devices. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation (SAMOS '05), July 2005, Samos, Greece, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3553: 142-151.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schulte M, Glossner J, Mamidi S, Moudgill M, Vassiliadis S: A low-power multithreaded processor for baseband communication systems. In Embedded Processor Design Challenges: Systems, Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 3133. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2004:393-402.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols B, Buttlar D, Farrell J: Pthreads Programming: A POSIX Standard for Better Multiprocessing, O'Reilly Nutshell Series. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, Calif, USA; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jarvinen K, Vainio J, Kapanen P, et al.: GSM enhanced full rate speech codec. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '97), April 1997, Munich, Germany 2: 771-774.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kotlyar V, Moudgill M: Detecting overflow detection. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and Systems Synthesis (CODES+ISSS '04), September 2004, Stockholm, Sweden 36-41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Balzola PI, Schulte M, Ruan J, Glossner J, Hokenek E: Design alternatives for parallel saturating multioperand adders. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors (ICCD '01), September 2001, Austin, Tex, USA 172-177.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin Y, Lee H, Woh M, et al.: SODA: a low-power architecture for software radio. Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA '06), June 2006, Boston, Mass, USA 89-100.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Lodi A, Cappelli A, Bocchi M, et al.: XiSystem: a XiRisc-based SoC with reconfigurable IO module. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 2006,41(1):85-96. 10.1109/JSSC.2005.859319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Duller A, Panesar G, Towner D: Parallel processing - the picoChip way! Communicating Process Architectures (CPA '03), September 2003, Enschede, The Netherlands 125-138.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohebbi B, Filho EC, Maestre R, Davies M, Kurdahi FJ: A case study of mapping a software-defined radio (SDR) application on a reconfigurable DSP core. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis, October 2003, Newport Beach, Calif, USA 103-108.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ungerer T, Robič B, Šilc J: A survey of processors with explicit multithreading. ACM Computing Surveys 2003,35(1):29-63. 10.1145/641865.641867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith BJ: The architecture of HEP. In Parallel MIMD Computation: HEP Supercomputer and Its Applications. Edited by: Kowalik JS. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA; 1985:41-55.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mankovic TE, Popescu V, Sullivan H: CHoPP principles of operations. Proceedings of the 2nd International Supercomputer Conference, May 1987, Mannheim, Germany 2-10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tullsen DM, Eggers SJ, Levy HM: Simultaneous multithreading: maximizing on-chip parallelism. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA '95), June 1995, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy 392-403.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Parson D, Beatty P, Glossner J, Schlieder B: A framework for simulating heterogeneous virtual processors. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Simulation Symposium, April 1999, San Diego, Calif, USA 58-67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Leupers R, Elste J, Landwehr B: Generation of interpretive and compiled instruction set simulators. Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC '99), January 1999, Wanchai, Hong Kong 1: 339-342.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zivojnovic V, Tjiang S, Meyr H: Compiled simulation of programmable DSP architectures. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on VLSI Signal Processing, October 1995, Osaka, Japan 187-196.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pees S, Hoffmann A, Zivojnovic V, Meyr H: LISA—machine description language for cycle-accurate models of programmable DSP architectures. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC '99), June 1999, New Orleans, La, USA 933-938.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu J, Gajski DD: An ultra-fast instruction set simulator. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 2002,10(3):363-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cmelik R, Keppel D: Shade: a fast instruction-set simulator for execution profiling. In Tech. Rep. UWCSE 93-06-06. University of Washington, Washington, DC, USA; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nohl A, Braun G, Schliebusch O, Leupers R, Meyr H, Hoffmann A: Design innovations for embedded processors: a universal technique for fast and flexible instruction-set architecture simulation. In Proceedings of the 39th Design Automation Conference (DAC '02), June 2002, New Orleans, La, USA. ACM Press; 22-27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Glossner.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glossner, J., Iancu, D., Moudgill, M. et al. The Sandbridge SB3011 Platform. J Embedded Systems 2007, 056467 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/56467

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/56467

Keywords

  • Development System
  • Software Development
  • Control Structure
  • Electronic Circuit
  • Multimedia Application