Table 6 Performance comparison in different scenarios: WSNHA-LBAR (abbreviated by LBAR) versus LAR versus AODVjr.
From: Location-Based Self-Adaptive Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks in Home Automation
| Â | Â | Packet delivery ratio (%) | Residual energy ratio (%) | Routing over-head | Packet average delay (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1 | LBAR | 96.39 | 67.12 | 2727 | 0.011821 |
| Â | LAR | 95.61 | 67.11 | 2771 | 0.010357 |
| Â | AODVjr | 95.35 | 66.94 | 2741 | 0.011663 |
Scenario 2 | LBAR | 93.16 | 81.14 | 2855 | 0.056528 |
| Â | LAR | 90.20 | 81.67 | 2817 | 0.037353 |
| Â | AODVjr | 87.75 | 81.47 | 3068 | 0.032544 |
Scenario 3 | LBAR | 90.57 | 87.69 | 2836 | 0.061318 |
| Â | LAR | 88.88 | 87.57 | 2896 | 0.056214 |
| Â | AODVjr | 86.88 | 87.32 | 3820 | 0.067793 |