Table 5 Performance comparison in different scenarios: WSNHA-LBAR (abbreviated by LBAR) versus LAR versus AODVjr.
From: Location-Based Self-Adaptive Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks in Home Automation
| Â | Â | Packet delivery ratio (%) | Residual energy ratio (%) | Routing over-head | Packet average delay (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1 | LBAR | 94.35 | 80.76 | 2814 | 0.040136 |
| Â | LAR | 92.32 | 81.29 | 2858 | 0.037440 |
| Â | AODVjr | 88.08 | 81.19 | 2989 | 0.033575 |
Scenario 2 | LBAR | 93.16 | 81.14 | 2855 | 0.056528 |
| Â | LAR | 90.20 | 81.67 | 2817 | 0.037353 |
| Â | AODVjr | 87.75 | 81.47 | 3068 | 0.032544 |
Scenario 3 | LBAR | 91.12 | 81.12 | 2743 | 0.054299 |
| Â | LAR | 89.68 | 81.59 | 2770 | 0.034033 |
| Â | AODVjr | 87.55 | 81.07 | 3043 | 0.029594 |
Scenario 4 | LBAR | 90.76 | 81.46 | 2715 | 0.052759 |
| Â | LAR | 89.63 | 81.49 | 2786 | 0.029624 |
| Â | AODVjr | 87.06 | 81.37 | 3062 | 0.046035 |