Table 3 Performance comparison in different scenarios: WSNHA-LBAR (abbreviated by LBAR) versus LAR versus AODVjr.
From: Location-Based Self-Adaptive Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks in Home Automation
| Â | Â | Packet delivery ratio (%) | Residual energy ratio (%) | Routing over-head | Packet average delay (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1 | LBAR | 93.16 | 81.14 | 2855 | 0.056528 |
| Â | LAR | 90.20 | 81.67 | 2817 | 0.037353 |
| Â | AODVjr | 87.75 | 81.47 | 3068 | 0.032544 |
Scenario 2 | LBAR | 87.91 | 82.02 | 2794 | 0.088583 |
| Â | LAR | 86.87 | 81.73 | 2911 | 0.056940 |
| Â | AODVjr | 82.01 | 82.37 | 3172 | 0.098966 |
Scenario 3 | LBAR | 86.53 | 82.30 | 2931 | 0.122545 |
| Â | LAR | 81.59 | 83.00 | 3042 | 0.086083 |
| Â | AODVjr | 71.31 | 83.51 | 3922 | 0.243504 |