Table 5 Hardware comparisons with other sensors.
From: A DVP-Based Bridge Architecture to Randomly Access Pixels of High-Speed Image Sensors
Design | Process | Pixel array (resolution) | Size | Chip area (mm2) | Data rate | Power (mW) | Random access? | Application type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zhang et al. [13] | 0.18 um | — |
| 6.43 | 2 fps | 3.6 @1.8 v | N | S (Wireless endoscopy) |
Nishikawa et al. [17] | 0.25 um |
|
| 50.0 | 3,000 fps | — | N | S (Cosine transform) |
Lin et al. [18] | 0.5 um |
| — | — | — | — | N | S (Lossy wavelet) |
Yoon et al. [25] | 0.35 um |
|
| 8.52 | 30 fps | 20 @3.3 v | N | S (Mobile communication) |
Elouardi et al. [26] | 0.6 um |
| — | 10.0 | — | 30 | N | S (Retina based) |
Ji and Abshire [28] | 0.18 um |
|
| 9.0 | — | — | N | S (Low light) |
Takayanagi et al. [29] | 0.25 um |
|
| 376.27 | 60 fps | 597@3.3 v | N | S (UDTV) |
Teman et al. [27] | 0.18 um |
| — | — | 100 fps | 2 | N | S (Tracking) |
Oi et al. [9] | 0.8 um |
|
| 25.0 | 60 fps | 6.8 @3.3 v | Y | S (3D viewing) |
Yadid-Pecht et al. [6] | 3.0 um |
|
| 72.68 | — | — | Y | G |
Scheffer et al. [7] | 0.5 um |
|
| 265.69 | — | <100 | Y | G |
Decker et al. [8] | 0.8 um |
| — | — | 390 fps | 52 | Y | G |
Chapinal et al. [10] | 0.7 um |
| — | 16.0 | — | 6.5 @5 v | Y | G |
Dierickx [12] | 0.5 um |
|
| 256 | 8 fps | — | Y | G |
Proposed iBridge (without sensor) | 0.18 um | Any size |
| 1.96 | 254 mega-samples/sec | 13.8 @3 v | Y | G |
iBridge with OV HD sensor (OV2710) [32] | 0.18 um | Full HD | — | 45.74 | 30 fps | 363.8 @3 v | Y | G |
